Investments and Challenges for Enterprises †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Investments and Challenges for Enterprises. Answer: Introduction Internet of Things (IoT) involves the procedure of connecting the software, hardware and sensors. The implementation of IoT technology in farming and agriculture has significantly changed the scenario of farming as a whole. The quality has improved a lot with the advent of IoT. The various technologies associated with the IoT technology have changed the food quality. The farmers always stay connected to the Internet and use the wireless network for the benefits. Now, there is a drawback, since the farmers use the insecure network they fall into prey of the cyber attackers, they attack their systems and lock their system and asking for money. The ransomware attack cost them too much. They steal the farmers data as well. This research study will review the issues and provide solutions to strengthen the security framework for the betterment of the farmers so that they can conduct their activities safely and securely over the network. The common security issues with wireless technologies This research study will showcase the issues and provide solutions to strengthen the security framework for the betterment of the farmers so that they can conduct their activities safely and securely over the network. Jing et al., (2014) suggested the common security solutions in the wireless technology. The risks those are associated with the wireless technology are- Intrusion: The mobile network is being more opened to the intruders, they easily gain access to those mobile devices via an unprotected network and make it vulnerable.tivities. Granjal, Monteiro Silva, (2015) depicted the active attack and the passive attack involved elaborately and lack of security can lead to both physical and virtual intruder attack such as hacking, data theft, the system integrity destruction. The active attack involves ID spoofing is basically related to the unauthorised access or unauthorised privileges, the active attack also involves the access of personal files in the computer system by means of alternation or modification of the data, that active attack also correlates the dictionary attacks to detect or identify a set of station service identifiers. According to Da et al., (2014) the replay attack or DoS attack is associated with accessing and exploiting the wired equivalent privacy encryption. According to Gubbi et al., (2013) the passive attack involves the accumulation of the information when the information is in transmitting in between the unauthorised devices. The passive attack can occur by the following two methods- Eavesdropping: this method involves the monitoring and administering of the transmissions of the message components in between the devices Traffic analysis: Loo, Mauri Ortiz, (2016) mentioned the process which involves monitoring and administrations of transmissions for particular patterns of communication. All the techniques described above are a part of criminal activities that involves hacking and exploiting the mobile system and wireless system and () depicted them beautifully. The current security solutions for the security threats on Internet of Thing Borgohain, Kumar Sanyal, (2015) presented the security solutions that are associated with the IoT for diminishing the security threats are- authentication, securing communication that means data protection while it is in transit, protection of data while in the process, securing storage which involves protecting data while the data is at rest. Authentication: Abomhara Kien, (2014) depicted the common algorithm AES and SHA-256 that aids in authentication; the authentication process involves the usage of the asymmetric public key. In case of authentication public key concept is used to encipher and decipher data for enhancing security. The sender sends a data encrypted with the secure key and the receiver on the other end can only get access to the data by decrypting the same data with the secure key. The sender and the receiver can only access the data and they have to have the key, that means the intruders in between if try to access the data they will have to know the key encryption ensures data safety. Whitmore, Agarwal Da Xu, (2015) highlighted that digital signature is another form of authentication. The concept of digital certificate involves a private key encryption which can only be opened by the public key, the private key is only known to the sender and the receiver. Securing data communication by means of algorithms: According to Botta et al., (2016) the software implementations to secure the data my means for authentication can be power consuming. When that software deployed in a system, it takes a lot of CPU cycles for processing, hence the system becomes slow and sluggish at times, hence it delays other vital works and makes the network slower. However, the problem can be solved by the implementation of the symmetric encryption algorithms like AES and 3DES and the asymmetric algorithms RSA and ECDSA. According to Al-Fuqahaet al., (2015) implementations of all these algorithms make the system faster and hence make it power-efficient. The software implications, on the other hand, can be tedious and can slow the system and hence should be replaced by these algorithms. Secure transit: Matharu, Upadhyay Chaudhary, (2014) stated that the sensitive information while in transit must remain safe and secure all throughout the transmission between the sender and the receiver, and those must not be leaked in any way. However, in some instances in case of payment applications, another safety and security layer is required, certain software tools come into play in this case, and the execution of the code can be made secure by implementing those tools. The secured environment can be achieved by the security chips and the inbuilt security chips in the IoT device host CPU. Securing the data while storing in the device: When the data is stored in the database of the IoT devices, it can be made secure with the secure key and the unique device identifier. From the root keys, the session keys are generated and these keys are for authentication and securing connection among the devices. According to Chen et al., (2014), the authorised users who know the keys' details can only access and can further communicate with the devices; these data are secured in terms of warranty and privacy. Securing personal information: IoT helps to secure and protect the assets of the users. IoT helps to build custom applications to protect users' data; it makes users' life simpler. Stay ahead of the customers: The developers or the manufacturers by taking the help of cloud technology and advanced IoT solutions can stay ahead of their competitors. Providing benefits to agriculture and farming: The farmers or any individuals can use the IoT configured hardware and software solutions to get cost-effective and secured service. IoT providing advanced data storage: According to Grieco et al., (2014), the clients can get the advanced data storage facilities and standard, and also the advanced data protection via IoT. The attackers or the intruders finding out the loopholes has spread their arms and the cyber crimes are increasing day by day, ransomware is one of that kind, the ransomware virus become popular because of the following flaws- Lack of proper authorization technique: Lack of strong passwords can lead to unauthorised access and lead to unethical data usage. Encryption failure: Martnez-Prez et al., (2015) showcased that the devices fail to encrypt or decrypt data when the data is transferred, even though the device is connected to the Internet. The security credentials: The users use the same default username and password preconfigured for the devices. Privacy issues: The privacy issues incur as the organisations collect data from the customers via an insecure network. Open-source software: According to Trappe, Howard Moore, (2015), IoT devices must be configured with the open-source software and not the paid software, as these can reduce the usage of IoT technology and the students and the educators can face challenges adopting the new technology for them. Open-source software help to overcome the security breaches easily. IoT in testing mode: IoT technology is still in beta mode and needs to be revolutionised, there are many security breaches and several pitfalls that need to be addressed and solved as soon as possible. The better ways of overcoming the security challenges that can assist farmers The best possible solution for overcoming the security challenges in the IoT devices is to protect the personal information and details and the specifications by implementing required IoT devices that are IoT algorithms and associated IoT hardware. IoT hardware can make the whole system cost-effective as well as the algorithms can help them to process things over the Internet further. Moreover, it provides us with a secured solution. Lee Lee, (2015) depicted that the security can be achieved by following means Patching all the system requirements on a daily basis: The computer desktop, as well as the mobile devices, must be configured and set up to install the daily updates. The updated patches include all the solutions for the security breaches. So, the updated operating system is less vulnerable to threats. Backup system files and personal data: The backing up of system files and the personal data help in this scenario. If any important files get affected then it will not hurt, so the backup is easiest and cheapest method, it helps to mitigate the effect of ransomware effect. Updated software: According to Farooq et al., (2015), the software or apps installed in the device must be updated all the time; the browsers must be updated, as the outdated software is more vulnerable to security threats and risks. Blocking SMB inbound or outbound on the firewall: The ransomware virus basically spread through Windows SMB services, so implementation and configuration of firewall can mitigate the risk of ransomware. Installation of antivirus software: Sicari et al., (2015) stated that the antivirus software installation can help definitely help to fight against the ransomware, any basic antivirus available in the market can secure the network from the potential attack of ransomware virus. The farmers must take the definite approaches discussed that will enhance the security and also provide various farming facilities. The farmers must install the antivirus software in their system and must keep it updated; the software can definitely help them to stay away from the adverse effect of the ransomware virus. According to Anwar et al., (2014), the farmers should back up their business data and files regularly. They can store the files on a USB stick or USB flash drive, they can be ensured by simply testing whether the backup files are working or not. Saving files in read-only mode The farmers can make a simple move. The ransomware virus cannot attack the files that are read-only. Therefore, they can make a trick and save their files in read-only mode, in this way they can protect their files and they do not have to pay a large amount to the intruders. According to Anwar et al., 2014, the above model demonstrates how IoT works. The model gives a general overview of a secured connection established between IoT devices, IoT server and the IoT-Ticket Dashboard. This ensures secure data transmission and protection from ransomware. Sicari et al., 2015 showcased the above model that demonstrates the sensors integrated with data storage and in between the IoT structure which provides the network security. From this image, the underlying structure can be seen. Granjal, Monteiro Silva, 2015 demonstrates the above model in details and the applications of agriculture with the cloud and database, the data accumulated is stored securely in the database for future analysis. Li, Da Zhao, (2015) stated that the IoT is in testing mode, the farmer can still get enough advantages from the IoT services, though in mere future they will get more benefits from the IoT. Conclusion It can be concluded from the above discourse that IoT has a lot to offer to the farmer and agriculture. The quality has enhanced a great deal with the appearance of IoT. The different innovations related with the agriculture have changed the sustenance quality. The agriculturists dependably remain associated with the Internet and utilize the network system for the advantages. Presently, there is a downside, since the intruders utilize the unreliable system they fall into prey of the cyber attackers, they attack their devices and lock their devices and requesting cash. The ransomware attack cost them excessively. They take the agriculturists' information also. This investigation features those issues and furthermore gives helpful answers for the particular issues confronted by the clients. This examination study highlighted the issues and give answers for reinforcing the security structure for the improvement of the agriculturists so they can lead their activities securely and safely. The various approaches of IoT will help definitely help in agriculture to achieve the desired security, the farmers will have to install antivirus and update them daily, should back up important files. The limitations of IoT have also been discussed. It is hoped that IoT will come up new security features that can embellish the overall structure of agriculture. References Abomhara, M., Kien, G. M. (2014, May). Security and privacy in the Internet of Things: Current status and open issues. InPrivacy and Security in Mobile Systems (PRISMS), 2014 International Conference on(pp. 1-8). IEEE. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications.IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials,17(4), 2347-2376. Anwar, R. W., Bakhtiari, M., Zainal, A., Abdullah, A. H., Qureshi, K. N., Computing, F., Bahru, J. (2014). Security issues and attacks in wireless sensor network.World Applied Sciences Journal,30(10), 1224-1227. Borgohain, T., Kumar, U., Sanyal, S. (2015). Survey of security and privacy issues of Internet of Things.arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.02211. Botta, A., De Donato, W., Persico, V., Pescap, A. (2016). Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: a survey.Future Generation Computer Systems,56, 684-700. Chen, S., Xu, H., Liu, D., Hu, B., Wang, H. (2014). A vision of IoT: Applications, challenges, and opportunities with china perspective.IEEE Internet of Things journal,1(4), 349-359. Da Xu, L., He, W., Li, S. (2014). Internet of things in industries: A survey.IEEE Transactions on industrial informatics,10(4), 2233-2243. Farooq, M. U., Waseem, M., Khairi, A., Mazhar, S. (2015). A critical analysis on the security concerns of internet of things (IoT).International Journal of Computer Applications,111(7). Granjal, J., Monteiro, E., Silva, J. S. (2015). Security for the internet of things: a survey of existing protocols and open research issues.IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials,17(3), 1294-1312. Grieco, L. A., Rizzo, A., Colucci, S., Sicari, S., Piro, G., Di Paola, D., Boggia, G. (2014). IoT-aided robotics applications: Technological implications, target domains and open issues.Computer Communications,54, 32-47. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions.Future generation computer systems,29(7), 1645-1660. Jing, Q., Vasilakos, A. V., Wan, J., Lu, J., Qiu, D. (2014). Security of the internet of things: Perspectives and challenges.Wireless Networks,20(8), 2481-2501. Lee, I., Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises.Business Horizons,58(4), 431-440. Li, S., Da Xu, L., Zhao, S. (2015). The internet of things: a survey.Information Systems Frontiers,17(2), 243-259. Loo, J., Mauri, J. L., Ortiz, J. H. (Eds.). (2016).Mobile ad hoc networks: current status and future trends. CRC Press. Martnez-Prez, B., De La Torre-Dez, I., Lpez-Coronado, M. (2015). Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations.Journal of medical systems,39(1), 181. Matharu, G. S., Upadhyay, P., Chaudhary, L. (2014, December). The Internet of Things: challenges security issues. InEmerging Technologies (ICET), 2014 International Conference on(pp. 54-59). IEEE. Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Grieco, L. A., Coen-Porisini, A. (2015). Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead.Computer Networks,76, 146-164. Trappe, W., Howard, R., Moore, R. S. (2015). Low-energy security: Limits and opportunities in the internet of things.IEEE Security Privacy,13(1), 14-21. Whitmore, A., Agarwal, A., Da Xu, L. (2015). The Internet of ThingsA survey of topics and trends.Information Systems Frontiers,17(2), 261-274.